Could IC (Navistar) enter the transit bus market?
#1
Posted 21 March 2010 - 10:03 PM
However, there are some school bus manufacturers who tried to enter the transit bus market with not-so-great results. The SLF, a joint venture between Freightliner's Thomas Built Buses and Dennis Specialist Vehicles, has proven to be quite an unreliable model. As for Blue Bird, while their past CSFE/CSRE bus has been moderately successful, the Ultra LF has been quite a poor seller and is also known to be unreliable. There are some rumors that NABI will be discontinuing the Ultra LF soon.
So, what does anyone think about IC Bus entering the transit bus market?
Thus the Powerpuff Buses were born! Using their alternative propulsion,
Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup
...have dedicated their lives for putting Albuquerque on the Move!
#2
Posted 21 March 2010 - 10:11 PM
ABQ RIDE, on Mar 21 2010, 08:03 PM, said:
However, there are some school bus manufacturers who tried to enter the transit bus market with not-so-great results. The SLF, a joint venture between Freightliner's Thomas Built Buses and Dennis Specialist Vehicles, has proven to be quite an unreliable model. As for Blue Bird, while their past CSFE/CSRE bus has been moderately successful, the Ultra LF has been quite a poor seller and is also known to be unreliable. There are some rumors that NABI will be discontinuing the Ultra LF soon.
So, what does anyone think about IC Bus entering the transit bus market?
What is this?
http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?s=&showt...st&p=386384
#3
Posted 21 March 2010 - 11:00 PM
M. Parsons, on Mar 21 2010, 07:11 PM, said:
http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?s=&showt...st&p=386384
Does that really qualify? It doesn't seem like a real transit bus IMO.
BTW, I saw some of Santa Fe Trails' new ElDorado Passport CNG buses when I went to Santa Fe on Thursday. Unfortunately, I didn't get any pics.
Thus the Powerpuff Buses were born! Using their alternative propulsion,
Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup
...have dedicated their lives for putting Albuquerque on the Move!
#5
Posted 21 March 2010 - 11:10 PM
M. Parsons, on Mar 21 2010, 08:02 PM, said:
If it's not being used in real transit service, then what in the hell does it do? Fake transit service?
Well, I guess you have a point, however, even basic cutaways can be used in regular transit service, not just for paratransit or on-demand service. I was personally thinking if they would release a rear-engined low-floor transit bus to compete against the Blue Bird Ultra LF, Optima Opus, and ElDorado EZ Rider II MAX.
Personally, I think such model would be ideal for ABQ RIDE's 350 route which is a nonstop route between the Albuquerque Sunport and the Alvarado Transportation Center/Rail Runner Station in Downtown Albuquerque. Currently, the route operates using one of ABQ RIDE's SunVan cutaways.
Thus the Powerpuff Buses were born! Using their alternative propulsion,
Blossom, Bubbles, and Buttercup
...have dedicated their lives for putting Albuquerque on the Move!
#6
Posted 22 March 2010 - 10:08 PM
ABQ RIDE, on Mar 21 2010, 10:10 PM, said:
Personally, I think such model would be ideal for ABQ RIDE's 350 route which is a nonstop route between the Albuquerque Sunport and the Alvarado Transportation Center/Rail Runner Station in Downtown Albuquerque. Currently, the route operates using one of ABQ RIDE's SunVan cutaways.
IMHO, the small rear-engined low floor transit bus market in North America is a bit over-crowded. Besides the aforementioned 3 models, the 29ft. version of the Gillig Low Floor is competiting heavily in the same sector and, with the EZ Rider II MAX, probably eating into the sales of the Opus & the Ultra LF. Not to mention that NABI's own 31-LFW, 30ft versions of Orion VII & even the New Flyer LFR series (the latter admittedly hasn't sold new 30ft. low-floors for a few years until the possible SORTA order in Cincinati due to its inability to add a rear door) are out there to capture customers that are absolutely loyal to these manufacturers. As a result, it will be rather foolhardy for IC Bus to enter this market at this stage.
As an off-topic comment, I still think it makes business sense for NABI to focus on just the 31-LFW and/or the better bus between the Opus and the Ultra LF to reduce overlaps in its product range. If they must keep a ligther-duty low-floor bus, I'll definitely go for the Opus; but please consider axing the Under-35 version as it overlaps with the 35-LFW!
#7
Posted 22 March 2010 - 11:11 PM
M. Parsons, on Mar 21 2010, 09:11 PM, said:
http://www.cptdb.ca/index.php?s=&showt...st&p=386384
This is the IC Bus LC-Series low floor cutaway also known as the Champion EZ Trans in otehr speaks, as depicted in this website: http://www.icbus.com/ICBus/Commercial/Bus+...Buses/LC+Series
I've pictured such buses in Montgomery County, Md. outside Washington DC with its Ride-On fleet & Texarkana, Ark./Texas with its T-Line fleet. I'm attaching Ride-On's bus 5211 & T-Line's 2077 as examples. Another major oerator of these buses is River Valley Metro in Kankakee, Ill.
By the way, this model has been invading my original home state of Florida, with JTA in Jacksonville, Lakexpress in Lake County & Space Coast Area Transit all taking examples (pictures from other transit fans direct confirms the presence of JTA's examples & indirectly of the Lakexpress buses; while I've only learnt of the last agency's buses through a new article showing one such bus involved in an accident).
I have just a few of questions:
1 Is the LC the most successful low-floor cutaway bus in North America?
2. Besides ETS and Paducah Area Transit System in Paducah, Ky., are there any other oprators of Glaval's rival Easy On design? (I consider King County Metro's troubled Workhorse vans a Easy On derivative instead of true Easy On's)
3. Is the use of cutaway vans/trucks as transit buses currently unique in North America? (I know there're Ford Transit & Freight Rover Shepra conversions in the UK during the mid 80's through early 90's similar to today's cutaways, but even the Mercedes conversions popularized from the late 80's through the early 2000's have their bodies way better integrated with the cabs than the North American cutaways; and there were also purpose-built MCW/Optare Metroriders that weren't cutaways in design. Likewise, most minibuses in Hong Kong, my longtime home city are of purpose built designs like the Toyota Coaster)
4. Why the practice of using purpose-built low-floor vans/minibuses never caught on in North America like the Optare Solo in the UK?
Thanks!
Attached Files
#8
Posted 23 March 2010 - 01:30 PM
Buzz2kb, on Mar 22 2010, 09:11 PM, said:

R.I.P. "mike from edmonton"
---
J. L. Bures
"Your friendly neighborhood transit fan"
#9
Posted 23 March 2010 - 07:51 PM
#10
Posted 23 March 2010 - 08:15 PM
Buzz2kb, on Mar 22 2010, 08:11 PM, said:
JetBlue Airways has used them for airside terminal shuttles at New York's JFK Airport since 2006, and I believe they're also used at Indianapolis's airport.
#11
Posted 23 April 2012 - 02:53 PM
http://www.neobus.ne...hip_with_neobus
and
Navistar Announces Global Commercial Bus Partnership with Investment in Brazilian Bus Builder Neobus Company Takes Stake in Brazilian Bus Body Builder; Will Work Together on Fully Integrated Commercial Buses for South America and North America
LISLE, Ill., Jan. 31, 2012
Quote
The headline and quote come from http://www.navistar....r/News/Newsroom#
#13
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:09 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













